Against Adversarial Discussion


Why did R.G. Collingwood come to reject the adversarial style of philosophical discussion so popular among his Oxford peers? The main aim of this paper is to explain that Collingwood came to reject his colleagues’ specific style of philosophical dialogue on methodological grounds, and to show how the argument against adversarial philosophical discussion is integrated with Collingwood’s overall criticism of realist philosophy. His argument exploits a connection between method and practice that should be taken seriously even today.

Collingwood and British Idealism Studies
Maarten Steenhagen
Research Fellow in Philosophy

My research interests include philosophy of mind, philosophy of perception, philosophical logic and aesthetics